March 15


Safe & Effective?

minutes remaining

Well, I guess everyone knows already what I point to here… Looking back to June 2020, I vividly remember the message about the emerging “vaccines” against C19 being described as “safe & effective”.

Now, what might be wrong with that picture?

Besides the fact that some very bright minds had been trying for decades to create a vaccine that targeted corona type viruses, and that effective vaccines against any virus is pretty darn few and far apart, I can think of a few more points.

Please don’t hesitate to add to the list for yourself:

  1. How could it be possible to make so surefire statements about a widely untested substance?
  2. Why did Big Pharma demand a carte blanche from any responsibility if they were sure about safety?
  3. For what reason did virtually no official outlet discuss a risk stratification strategy based on known risk factors?
  4. What happened to the market forces that lead to the suppliers defining the demand?
  5. How come that basic axioms in science were completely ignored time and time again?
  6. When did the opinions and motives of single individuals and entities become more important than the scientific process?

And, maybe the most important question of all, why did virtually no-one consider the measurable effects of the virus spreading before jumping to conclusions based on predictions already proven wrong?

Review the Data

To just briefly explain that last paragraph, the Imperial College predicted a number of casualties in a small country like Sweden without lockdown to reach between 60,000 and 80,000 by May. The true number was less than 6000, with a median age above the life expectancy!

Now, I don’t mean to be cold hearted here, yet it might be considered acceptable, and maybe even expected, that people of a certain age lose their life for some reason or another, right?!

More importantly, no official channel even touched on the option of stratifying for potential loss of life years. And what do I mean by that?

Well, the risk of an infection (any infection actually) being more severe or even lethal, increases immensely with age, especially above a certain age bracket. Which basically means that the older you are, the more you could potentially benefit from protection agains any particular immunological threat.

Contrary to that, most younger people (estimates reaching from 25 and 50 years of age up to 70 or 75 depending on whom you ask) could expect a rather mild infection from this particular bug, yet have WAY more to lose in case they encounter any unwanted effects from a countering measure.

Now, you might say that it’s easy to look in the rear view mirror, and I agree completely.

I just believe that some people in charge should have done that in June of 2020, because there was enough data then to question the danger of the bug in question.

And, besides all that, when the so-called vaccines were presented as “safe & effective” there’s one thing we can know for sure:

It was a lie!!!

How can I say that?

Well, very simple, there was no way to know the long term consequences of these novel and experimental (yes, experimental) products, and for the sole reason of not being able to support the statement with scientific data, the statement has to be wrong.

And stating something that one either knows is wrong, or that one should know is wrong by the nature of ones position or stature, defines the statement as a lie and the conveyor of the statement a liar.

Think about it…

People in the position of power did either deliberately or out of ignorance lie to the population, and even worse, coerced them to accept a potentially harmful treatment without even the slightest trace of scientific backup.

This is not merely an abomination in society, yet also an obvious breach of the Nuremburg code, which is a subject for a completely different post!

This being the fourth post in the series, and you’re still hanging around, I’m sure you can consider yourself one of my final 5 readers😉

Thank you for bearing with me, I hope that my words trigger some deep thinking, and that you’re willing to share those thoughts with the rest of us!

If you are curious about how to strengthen your critical thinking skills and become a more self-directed thinker, consider hopping on the early notification list for the upcoming Master Key Experience course starting in late September.

By taking action, you will also receive a FREE Tool called the 7 Day Mental Diet that can use right away to become aware of your current thoughts and begin directing them to what you want.


Read more articles by Claes Wallenberg

About the author

In addition to being a certified guide with the MKE since 2015, Claes uses his experience from his manual medicine practice in combination with extensive coaching and mentoring experience and being certified as a Color Code personal skills trainer and Colors for Leadership trainer, to inspire and facilitate people to become independent and discriminate thinkers working towards their dreams for the benefit of all.

You may also like...

  • Thank you so much, Claes, for showing us how an independent thinker thinks and takes action. I’ve been reviewing Emerson’s essay on Self-Reliance this week and love seeing your words echo his exactly about our world needing us to be exactly this. Bravo!

  • {"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}

    Stories Matter - Don't Miss Out!

    Get on the list for free updates. 

    Join our PRIVATE NEWSLETTER to learn things like "How to create more happiness with less stress" and other exciting stuff.  

    It's FREE. Do it now...